- "Educators assess students to learn about what they know and can do, but assessments do not offer a direct pipeline into a student's mind. Assessing educational outcomes is not as straightforward as measuring height or weight; the attributes to be measured are mental representations and processes that are not outwardly visible. One must therefore draw inferences about what students know and can do on the basis of what one sees them say, do, or make in a handful of particular situations. What a student knows and what one observes a student doing are not the same thing. The two can be connected only through a chain of inference, which involves reasoning from what one knows and observes to form explanations, conclusions, or predictions, as discussed in the following section. Assessment users always reason in the presence of uncertainty; as a result, the information produced by an assessment is typically incomplete, inconclusive, and amenable to more than one explanation" (p. 42)
powered by performancing firefox
1 comment:
You should be looking forward to the chapter by Brian Junker. It's totally excellent, providing the reader with a conceptual insight into sophisticated IRT modeling.
I like your blog, btw! As an intelligence researcher and psychometrician, this is what I want to read about!
T. Kuhn
University of Muenster
Post a Comment